Download Book ➡ Link
Read Book Online ➡ Link
From one of the nation’s preeminent constitutional scholars, a sweeping rethinking of the uses of history in constitutional interpretation Fights over history are at the heart of most important constitutional disputes in America. The Supreme Court’s current embrace of originalism is only the most recent example of how lawyers and judges try to use history to establish authority for their positions. Jack M. Balkin argues that fights over constitutional interpretation are often fights over collective memory. Lawyers and judges construct—and erase—memory to lend authority to their present-day views; they make the past speak their values so they can then claim to follow it. The seemingly opposed camps of originalism and living constitutionalism are actually mirror images of a single phenomenon: how lawyers use history to adapt an ancient constitution to a constantly changing world. Balkin shows how lawyers and judges channel history through standard forms of legal argument that shape how they use history and even what they see in history. He explains how lawyers and judges invoke history selectively to construct authority for their claims and undermine the authority of opposing views. And he elucidates the perpetual quarrel between historians and lawyers, showing how the two can best join issue in legal disputes. This book is a sweeping rethinking of the uses of history in constitutional interpretation.
LAWYERS AND HISTORIANS ARGUE ABOUT THE
by JM Balkin · 2020 · Cited by 22 —
Uses of History and Collective Memories by International
Collective memories occasionally affect the content of international legal rules, their interpretation, and compliance with these rules. Some collective
Memory and Authority The Uses of History in Constitutional
Memory and Authority The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation Jack M. Balkinの価格比較、最安値比較。(1/9時点 - 商品価格ナビ)
History, Memory and Law - DOCS@RWU
by VG Curran · 2011 · Cited by 7 —
Memory and Practice: Politics
by KM Baker · 1985 · Cited by 69 —
8 Conclusion: Memory in the Balance - Oxford Academic
AbstractThis conclusion takes stock of the preceding chapters. It asks whether courts should invoke the memory of historical evil and, if so, how.
IT IS A CONSTITUTION WE ARE EXPOUNDING
Zeppos, The Uses of Authority in Statutory Interpretation: An Empirical Constitutional law is about precedent, and text, and history, and law. But it is also
Memory and Authority by Jack M. Balkin
Memory and Authority · The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation - Jack M. Balkin ; Available · 27th February 2024 ; More in Jurisprudence & General